Tuesday, February 6, 2024
|
7:00 am-4:30 pm |
Registration and Check-In
If you haven't checked in, come to the AHLA Registration area to print your badge.
|
|
7:00-8:00 am |
Continental Breakfast, sponsored by PYA
This event is included in the program registration. Attendees, speakers, and registered spouses and guests welcome.
|
|
7:30-9:30 am |
15. In-House Counsel Think Tank, sponsored by HealthCare Appraisers, Inc
Allison Petersen, General Counsel, Integris Health, Oklahoma City, OK (Moderator)
This event is for attendees who serve as the general counsel or an in-house counsel at a health care provider ONLY; pre-registration is required; limited attendance (100); there is no additional fee.
|
|
8:00-9:15 am |
16. An Ounce of Prevention: Strategies to Address Inappropriate Provider Conduct at your AMC before it Becomes a Black Swan Event (not repeated)
Stacy Bratcher, Senior Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, Cottage Health, Santa Barbara, CA
Andreas Meyer, AJM Firm, Wichita, KS
Tom Ryan, McDermott, Will & Emery, Los Angeles, CA
Jeannine Taylor, Deputy General Counsel, Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA
-
AMCs and universities have paid more than $3 billion to resolve sexual assault and harassment claims arising from "sensitive exams" performed by employed physicians; making care environments safe is a "mission critical" risk for AMCs and their board to manage
-
Key steps for responding to a risk event at your AMC, including interactions with regulatory agencies, managing litigation, criminal proceedings, insurance recovery and public relations aspects
-
How Title IX, the Clery Act and ACA Section 1557 apply to Academic Medical Centers and how you can comply
-
How an effective risk management program and peer review structure can help identify risk issues and help you avoid black swan events
|
17. Current Trends in Payer/Provider Disputes
Elise D. Brennan, Conner & Winters LLP Tulsa, OK
Mackenzie S. Wallace, Thompson Coburn, Dallas, TX
Jeff J. Wurzburg, Norton Rose Fulbright, San Antonio, TX
-
Trends, practices, and tips across roles in disputes between physicians/health systems and payers, particularly in navigating the provider/hospital services agreements
-
Highlighted opportunities for improved positioning from multiple perspectives—provider, payer, arbitrator, and expert—when resolving such disputes
-
How to (1) anticipate such disputes, (2) establish robust processes for evidence preparation for such disputes, and (3) efficiently navigate such disputes
-
Typical contractual clauses in dispute and explore the stages of the disputes
-
The presentation is aimed to equip the audience with a comprehensive understanding of how to navigate and strategically approach provider/payer disputes in the current landscape
18. Antitrust Enforcement in the Biden Administration: What Health Care Counsel Needs to Know
Holden Brooks, McGuire Woods, Chicago, IL
Karen Hunt, Deputy Assistant Director for Mergers IV, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC
Joseph Miller, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC, Washington, DC
-
Merger policy – what’s new and what’s not for health care providers
-
Withdrawal of the Health Care Guidelines
-
Proposed rule on non-compete agreements in employment contracts
-
Private equity – why the hostility?
-
Increasing state AG interest in provider mergers
-
And much more
|
|
9:15-9:45 am |
Networking Break
Exhibits Open–Meet the Exhibitors
|
|
9:45-10:45 am |
19. Navigating Hospital-Based Coverage: Practice Consolidation, Compensation, and Negotiation (not repeated)
Ryan Kirshenbaum, J.D., Lead Staff Attorney - Nebraska Methodist Health System, Adjunct Professor of Law, Creighton University School of Law, Omaha, NE
Andrew Worthington, HealthCare Appraisers, Inc, Dallas, TX
-
Hospitals and corporations continue to acquire medical practices. These acquisitions were further accelerated due to COVID-19
-
As a result, securing affordable and efficient hospital-based clinical coverage is even more challenging
-
Financial support for and the costs to employ hospital-based coverage is a material expense for any health system
-
We will share our experience and solutions when it comes to contracting with medical groups for this coverage and in employing physicians and APPs for these service lines
-
Specifically, navigating pitfalls and challenges with regards to high staffing costs for physicians and APPs, rising profit margins and management fees, survey lag, volume and utilization
-
Securing a cost-effective, compliant coverage does not have to be a daunting task
20. Advancing Diversity in Academic Medicine After the Harvard/UNC Cases
Margia K. Corner, Senior Principal Counsel, University of California Office of General Counsel, Oakland, CA
Tahvia Jenkins, Athene Law, San Francisco, CA
Frank Trinity, Chief Legal Officer, AAMC, Washington, DC
Advancing diversity in the health care workforce remains critical to promoting health equity, improving patient experience, and improving patient safety. These efforts are integral to the mission of academic medical centers. The Supreme Court's decision in the Harvard and UNC cases poses new obstacles to racial diversity strategies in medical and other health professions schools. But there are many public institutions, such as the University of California, that have several decades' worth of experience pursuing race-neutral diversity strategies. This session is intended to facilitate a conversation about strategies that remain permissible after the Harvard/UNC decision and under state Constitutions/laws that prohibit preferential treatment based on race. We will also address strategies that appear to vulnerable to future challenges and/or that may not survive scrutiny under these laws.
|
8. Expansion without Acquisition: Health System Affiliation Strategies for Expanding Impact, Reach, and Revenues (repeat)
Michael B. Lampert, Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA
Eleni Robertson, Assistant General Counsel, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
-
What factors are driving academic health systems to expand?
-
What challenges to academic health systems encounter in expanding through traditional acquisition?
-
What strategies can academic health systems consider to expand without actually acquiring their new constituent members?
-
How might academic health systems evaluate the options for themselves?
|
10. Medical Staff Policies and Their Risks (repeat)
Alexis L. Angell, Polsinelli PC, Dallas, TX
Lindsey P. Ridgway, VP, Deputy General Counsel, Integris Health, Oklahoma City, OK
Scott Nichols, Nichols Brar Weitzner & Thomas, Houston, TX
This session will bring differing perspectives from in-house counsel for the health care entity, outside counsel for the medical staff, and counsel for the physician under peer review to provide the audience with insights through interactive discussion of hypotheticals touching on the following topics:
-
How to approach and work with physicians and medical staffs when wellness or health issues arise due to new or increased complaints, expressed concerns from colleagues, or trending data showing the need for a potential slow down of practice
-
Best practices for the hospital, medical staff, and physician when participating in collegial interventions and investigations and discussion of the NPDB’s updated guidance regarding when an investigation begins and reporting requirements for resignation while under or to avoid investigation
-
Options for avoiding the fair hearing process, including strong medical staff bylaws language and using experienced counsel to come to a reasonable resolution
-
Key items to know when the fair hearing is unavoidable to promote a fair and efficient process for the physician and the medical staff
|
|
10:45-11:00 am |
Break
|
|
11:00 am-12:00 pm |
21. Unreasonable and Overreaching or Justified? UPIC and Contractor Audits, Payment Suspensions, and Finding Resolution (not repeated)
Aletheia Lawry, Fountain Hills, AZ
B. Scott McBride, Morgan Lewis & Bockius Houston, TX
-
Review of UPIC activity
-
What is the scope of the UPIC?
-
Can the UPIC really ask for all that information?
-
How do you deal with a payment suspension?
-
What happens after the UPIC audit?
22. Legal Ethics Smooth Jazz - The Harmony Trio: Board Chair, President (CEO), and Legal Counsel
Sandra M. DiVarco, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, IL
Lisa Vandecaveye, Chief Legal Officer, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL
-
Legal counsel support of governance and management – Who is the client? What rules apply?
-
Providing governance and management legal support in between meetings
-
Board and individual Board member duties – Accreditation and legal standards
-
Maintaining privilege and sharing information with management and governance
-
D&O coverage and immunity – Limitations and practical considerations
23. A Slice of the AMC Pie–Legal and Value Considerations around Service Line Carveouts
Annapoorani Bhat, PYA, Charlotte, NC
Jeanna Palmer Gunville, Polsinelli PC, Chicago, IL
AMCs tend to be front runners when it comes to investing in important services for the community. Such investments may result in the development of new, innovative care protocols or new and profitable service lines, or they may end up creating substantial drain on scarce resources due to unforeseen circumstances or changing economy/industry trends. In some instances, it may be determined that these ventures will benefit financially and operationally from partnerships with, or a sale to, other health systems or private companies. Housed within the AMC’s legal structure, and dependent on overhead support from the system at large, it can be tricky to evaluate the profitability of these services, and bifurcate them from the overall AMC operations in preparation of a carve-out transaction. This session, which includes case studies, covers how AMCs and their advisors can prepare the organization for successful service line carveout transactions.
|
13. Digital Health and Artificial Intelligence (repeat)
Vanessa K. Burrows, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Carolyn V. Metnick, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Chicago, IL
-
Digital health and AI industry regulators and applicable laws
-
AI in health care–what’s going on and where is regulation of AI headed?
-
Legal risk areas for digital health and AI, including privacy, corporate practice of medicine, fraud and abuse, and FDA regulation of medical devices
-
Recent developments in digital health and AI, including enforcement actions and regulatory guidance
|
|
12:00-1:30 pm |
Networking and Presentation Lunch, hosted by Women's Leadership Council, sponsored by Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Title: Advising Providers on Maternal Health Disparities: Challenges and Opportunities
Catherine Lynn Allison, Assistant General Counsel, Office of Legal Counsel, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Priya J. Bathija, Founder & CEO, Nyoo Health, Falls Church, VA
Jennifer M. Nelson Carney, Epstein Becker & Green PC, Columbus, OH
Michael J. Regier, General Counsel and Secretary, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
This is not included in the program registration; there is an additional fee of $65; limited attendance; and pre-registration is required. Continuing Education Credits are not available.
|
|
1:45-3:00 pm |
24. There’s No Place Like Home: Remote Patient Monitoring to Help Dorothy Stay in Kansas while Avoiding the Twister of Regulatory Risks and Bringing Technicolor to the Possibilities of RPM and RTM (Advanced) (not repeated)
Betsy Hodge, Akerman LLP, West Palm Beach, FL
Gerard M. Nussbaum, Zarach Associates LLC Chicago, IL
Sean Sullivan, Alston & Bird LLP Atlanta, GA
This session will discuss the promises of Remote Physiological Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM) while explaining the regulatory and reimbursement rules approaches to overcome operational challenges, and contractual relationships with remote care delivery partners, including:
-
RPM and RTM CPT codes and reimbursement rules, including a summary of current rules and the most recent changes in the 2024 Physician Fee Schedule final rule
-
Use and reimbursement of telehealth when providing RPM and RTM
-
Partnering with third parties, including fraud and abuse implications, supervision issues, referral partners relationships, and contractual issues
-
Use of technology in RPM and RTM, including vetting technology providers, types of devices, availability and access to broadband, and privacy & security considerations
-
Use of RPM and RTM to address health equity goals and health care disparity, especially in rural areas, and addressing low technology literacy
-
Operational considerations in implementing and operating RPM/RTM, including data flows and integration challenges
-
The intersection of RPM and RTM with broader patient care management services and in-person care
-
Mitigating risks related to use of RPM and RTM, including documentation and overutilization concerns
25. Integrated Care Models that Address Complex Discharges Found in Academic Medical Centers (not repeated) (Advanced)
Mark A. Johnson, Hooper Lundy & Bookman PC, San Diego, CA
Mary T. Link, System VP/ Deputy General Counsel / Legal Operations, Risk & Regulatory, Middleton, WI
Rebecca Rodman, Husch Blackwell, Boston, MA
This panel will focus on addressing the challenges to discharging patients from academic medical centers and best practices from the field. Hear from representatives of an Academic Medical Center (AMC) and a post-acute care facility about their experiences with barriers to discharge, how those barriers impact care within the AMC, and how to relieve the subsequent strain on hospitals. The discussion will highlight the following topics:
|
26. Managing 2024's Top Compliance Risks and Opportunities (Advanced)
Anthony J. Burba, Barnes & Thornburg, Chicago, IL
Henry C. Leventis, United States Attorney, Nashville, TN
Ted Lotchin, Chief Compliance Officer, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC
This panel will present different perspectives on new and developing compliance risks and opportunities from the US Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee, a former federal prosecutor specializing in defending organizations from allegations of fraud and abuse, and the chief compliance officer from an academic medical center and teaching hospital. The panel will cover topics including:
-
Government enforcement and audit priorities for the provider community in 2024
-
A review of recent enforcement actions involving academic medical centers, teaching hospitals, and physicians
-
New and evolving risks and benefits of AI and other clinical decision support tools
-
Recent developments in compliance challenges with physician relationships
-
Evaluating your organization's COVID enforcement risk
-
Addressing and mitigating information privacy and security threats
|
17. Current Trends in Payer/Provider Disputes (repeat)
Elise D. Brennan, Conner & Winters LLP Tulsa, OK
Mackenzie S. Wallace, Thompson Coburn, Dallas, TX
Jeff J. Wurzburg, Norton Rose Fulbright, San Antonio, TX
-
Trends, practices, and tips across roles in disputes between physicians/health systems and payers, particularly in navigating the provider/hospital services agreements
-
Highlighted opportunities for improved positioning from multiple perspectives—provider, payer, arbitrator, and expert—when resolving such disputes
-
How to (1) anticipate such disputes, (2) establish robust processes for evidence preparation for such disputes, and (3) efficiently navigate such disputes
-
Typical contractual clauses in dispute and explore the stages of the disputes
-
The presentation is aimed to equip the audience with a comprehensive understanding of how to navigate and strategically approach provider/payer disputes in the current landscape
|
|
3:00-3:30 pm |
Networking Break
Exhibits Open–Meet the Exhibitors
|
|
3:30-4:30 pm |
27. Providers and Technology How Much Risk Do You Have: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Uglier (not repeated)
Marti Arvin, SVP, Chief Compliance and Privacy Officer, Erlanger Health, Ooltewah, TN
Joseph A. Dickinson, Wilmington, NC
-
The use of technology beyond the EHR
-
The value add of applications-including creating more efficiency and streamlining
-
Providers agreeing to terms with a third parties that allow for sharing of information
-
Whose legal obligation is it when the organization’s data gets shared inappropriately?
-
The organization’s practical responsibilities even if a legal obligation does not exist?
-
Practical ways to raise the awareness of providers
28. Building Compliant Virtual Care Networks: Beyond Bricks and Mortar Into Innovation
Mark S. Kopson, Plunkett Cooney, Bloomfield Hills, MI
Sarah E. Swank, General Counsel, On Belay Health Solutions, Washington, DC
Health care now is furnished not only in the provider’s office, but also in homes, offices, and other settings. Providers often are in different locations than their patients providing both in-person care and virtual care. In this intermediate-level session, the presenters will cover:
-
An overview of the key features of virtual provider networks (VPNs) and real-life examples of nursing, telehealth and ACO VPNs
-
How VPNs are impacting care delivery, payer-provider relations, network adequacy, and contracting
-
Development and implementation of a legally compliant structure and operations
-
Some of the most common and complex issues VPNs present, including corporate practice of medicine, licensing, supervision rules, and cyber issues
-
Practice pointers and practical solutions for professionals working with VPNs
5. Research Misconduct Regulations (repeat)
Kate G. Heffernan, Epstein Becker & Green PC, Boston, MA
Elizabeth J. McEvoy, Hinckley Allen, Boston, MA
This session will address emerging trends in research integrity and misconduct proceedings. Specifically the session will cover the following:
-
Introduction/overview: Research Integrity and Misconduct Today
-
Basic introduction to level-set (e.g., review the regulatory definition of research misconduct; identify the institutional/federal players involved)
-
How the initiation of a research misconduct complaint has changed from traditional whistleblower complaints (i.e., the increasing involvement of PubPeer, Artificial Intelligence technology and on-line integrity vigilantes in identifying potential concerns, and ORI’s direct involvement/delegation to institutions to inquire into these matters)
-
How the trajectory of a research misconduct proceeding has changed (i.e., ORI’s “scope” guidance)
-
Recent Trends and Enforcement Activity (e.g., the intersection of research misconduct and the False Claims Act/Civil Monetary Penalties)
-
Duke to Purdue (https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndin/pr/settlement-purdue-university-false-claims-research-grant-applications-federal-agencies), and settlements in between (e.g., Van Andel Research Institute)
-
Where Are We Going: The Proposed PHS Rule (key proposed changes will be discussed from the perspective of a respondent vs. an institution conducting the proceedings)
-
6-year time limitation and requirements around subsequent use exception
-
New definitions (e.g., recklessly, honest error)
-
Confidentiality
-
Procedural changes (e.g., formalized assessment, requirements for elective procedural rights, etc.)
|
23. A Slice of the AMC Pie–Legal and Value Considerations around Service Line Carveouts (repeat)
Annapoorani Bhat, PYA, Charlotte, NC
Jeanna Palmer Gunville, Polsinelli PC, Chicago, IL
AMCs tend to be front runners when it comes to investing in important services for the community. Such investments may result in the development of new, innovative care protocols or new and profitable service lines, or they may end up creating substantial drain on scarce resources due to unforeseen circumstances or changing economy/industry trends. In some instances, it may be determined that these ventures will benefit financially and operationally from partnerships with, or a sale to, other health systems or private companies. Housed within the AMC’s legal structure, and dependent on overhead support from the system at large, it can be tricky to evaluate the profitability of these services, and bifurcate them from the overall AMC operations in preparation of a carve-out transaction. This session, which includes case studies, covers how AMCs and their advisors can prepare the organization for successful service line carveout transactions
|
|